Journal: Military Medical Research
Article Title: The cellular response capacity (CRC) as a novel immunomonitoring approach in sepsis
doi: 10.1016/j.mmr.2026.100010
Figure Lengend Snippet: Methodological workflow from sample preparation to measuring the cellular response capacity (CRC). Following blood collection, samples are prepared for flow cytometric analysis either unstimulated (PBS as buffer control) or stimulated with an inflammatory cocktail (cocktail of N-formylmethionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine, platelet-activating factor, and tumor necrosis factor). The CRC is calculated as the ratio of median fluorescence intensity (MFI) between stimulated and unstimulated neutrophils. Three approaches, classic, simple, and kinetic CRC, offer distinct advantages and limitations based on technical aspects such as manual processing steps (e.g., centrifugation) and incubation time. n =13–14. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s post-hoc test, comparing patients with sepsis at all time points (shown in the figure: 0 h, not shown in the figure: 24, 72, 120 h) with healthy volunteers (HV). P -values are indicated above the respective data points. Asterisks indicate significant differences between HV and patients at 0 h only. ⁎ P <0.05, ⁎⁎ P <0.01, ⁎⁎⁎ P <0.001. AUC. Area under the curve; AU. Arbitrary units; PBS. Phosphate-buffered saline; E. coli Escherichia coli .
Article Snippet: Subsequently, the monovettes were exposed to either phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with calcium and magnesium (PBS +/+ , #14080055, Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) and the bacterial culture media [buffer control of Escherichia coli ( E. coli ) suspension, hereafter referred to as BuC], viable E. coli bacteria (ATCC line 25922, DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany), or LPS (100 ng/ml, from E. coli O55:B5, #L2637, Sigma Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany).
Techniques: Sample Prep, Control, Fluorescence, Centrifugation, Incubation, Saline